You're correct Shane, they were hand ported with a carbide burr finish. The exhaust ports had a smoother finish.
Ray
texture of ports?
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:44 am
- Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
- Contact:
Re: texture of ports?
My Flowbench is better than their's
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
Re: texture of ports?
So when I am done with a intake port it might help to scratch it up with a 40 or 80 grit roll or sand paper? I have been finishing with 120 grit. From the picture of Larrys work is he kinda makeing small grooves?
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:44 am
- Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
- Contact:
Re: texture of ports?
The finish in the pictures of Larry's work is made by the carbide burrs Larry ports with.haley63042 wrote:So when I am done with a intake port it might help to scratch it up with a 40 or 80 grit roll or sand paper? I have been finishing with 120 grit. From the picture of Larrys work is he kinda makeing small grooves?
Darin Morgan posted on SpeedTalk forum his best horsepower making heads were finished with the natural carbide burr texture.
I've used 40 & 60 grit cartridge rolls and 40 & 60 grit utility roll on a split mandrel for 30+ years with good results.
Like John mentioned most customers want to see a smooth finish even though they are losing horsepower.
Ray
My Flowbench is better than their's
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:41 am
- Location: Australia
Re: texture of ports?
The last head I ported had the rough carbide finish on the intake side, and polished on the exhaust side with 60grit rolls.
When I was asked why I didn't polish the intake side, I replied with, "do you want a port that works or a port that looks good in photo?, Because photos don't make power"
When I was asked why I didn't polish the intake side, I replied with, "do you want a port that works or a port that looks good in photo?, Because photos don't make power"
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:32 pm
Re: texture of ports?
Ditto. Exhaust passages get close to polished when I do a 2 stroke. The intake passages get a rough surface so the fuel doesn't settle out.
I did a Rotax engine in a snowmobile used for drag racing. The first time the owner took it out, he almost looped it. Throttle response (and power) caught him off guard.
I'm to the point where I'm going to try anti-reversion grooves/channels near the ports (valve seats in a 4-stroke).
John
I did a Rotax engine in a snowmobile used for drag racing. The first time the owner took it out, he almost looped it. Throttle response (and power) caught him off guard.
I'm to the point where I'm going to try anti-reversion grooves/channels near the ports (valve seats in a 4-stroke).
John
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: texture of ports?
Do you not think this a waste of time? I've never taken an engine apart to find the initially nicely polished pistons, combustion chambers and ex ports still clean and carbon free.....Racebrewer wrote:Ditto. Exhaust passages get close to polished when I do a 2 stroke.
I'm to the point where I'm going to try anti-reversion grooves/channels near the ports (valve seats in a 4-stroke).
John
What kind of ant-rev grooves/channels are you looking at using? I'm certainly no guru and am posting for debate purposes, but wonder if they are of any use at all. I feel that if you get your valve events, port shape and exhaust requirements correct it's the way forward.
Oh, welcome to the forum btw.
Hello stalker!
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:32 pm
Re: texture of ports?
Thanks for the welcome!
I think its worthwhile. IMHO(of course), the smoother the exhaust passage surface the less build-up you will get.
I'm working mostly with 2-stroke, piston port, motors so the piston acts as the valve. I believe that a coarser than cast surface in the intake passage helps keep the gasoline from settling out. We are required to run Sunoco 110 (not the best gas for the application), and I think that the rougher surface helps atomize the gas. Throttle response is definately improved.
I haven't had a chance to do a before and after on the dyno yet, but its on the list for the winter/spring.
For anti-reversion grooves, I'm looking at a series of grooves at the bottom of the intake passage close to where the bottom of the piston first opens the port (and where it last closes on the way back down.
John
I think its worthwhile. IMHO(of course), the smoother the exhaust passage surface the less build-up you will get.
I'm working mostly with 2-stroke, piston port, motors so the piston acts as the valve. I believe that a coarser than cast surface in the intake passage helps keep the gasoline from settling out. We are required to run Sunoco 110 (not the best gas for the application), and I think that the rougher surface helps atomize the gas. Throttle response is definately improved.
I haven't had a chance to do a before and after on the dyno yet, but its on the list for the winter/spring.
For anti-reversion grooves, I'm looking at a series of grooves at the bottom of the intake passage close to where the bottom of the piston first opens the port (and where it last closes on the way back down.
John