Page 2 of 2
Re: Converted CFM vs Real CFM
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:27 pm
by jfholm
I do!
John
Re: Converted CFM vs Real CFM
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:31 pm
by coulterracn
Hotz wrote:how many here use the program?
I use PipeMax
Re: Converted CFM vs Real CFM
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 9:11 pm
by cnsperf
I use PipeMax. Very good correlation with my Stuska/Depac dyno
Re: Converted CFM vs Real CFM
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 7:46 pm
by Bakerlite
Would be nice if he did a Demo program. I'd like to have a look around it before I purchased it.
Re: Converted CFM vs Real CFM
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 7:52 pm
by cnsperf
Buy it. The info on the forum is worth it if you never use the program. Larry will answer questions without holding anything back. Great stuff and well worth the money.
Re: Converted CFM vs Real CFM
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 9:46 pm
by Hotz
jfholm wrote:I do!
John
better defines this story **I do**....
*****************************************
Here toys
http://www.youtube.com/user/MaxRaceSoft ... sults_main
Re: Converted CFM vs Real CFM
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 6:49 am
by Hotz
Bakerlite wrote:Would be nice if he did a Demo program. I'd like to have a look around it before I purchased it.
here! information good...
http://www.flowbenchtech.com/forum/view ... f=14&t=537
Re: Converted CFM vs Real CFM
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 11:43 am
by johnsmith
I have recently got pipemax. when you buy it you can then access the forum and there's lots of info there, and from what i have seen Larry checks most days and answers what he can. For $50 you can't go wrong - that's 5 beers where I am.
I'd be interested in understanding how the experienced Pipemax guys are using the program when they start a porting project from scratch, and how they are using the information provided.....