
On another note please do not let this thread digress the way of other forum's threads . . . thanks (not directed at John*)
* We all know that that John Holms guy had a big penis, wait that guy was spelled Holmes wasn't it???
I will explain why BruceBrucepts wrote:
I'm truly an orphan in the Flowbench community, don't think anyone likes me other than the forum members
NICE! Your the type guy that I've been talking about. Your the guy that is the problem with this industry.
Chad, you want to call me an idiot? Fine, I'll call you a liar.
Just worry about yourself Gerald! And your WRONG.65mustang393 wrote:Chad's numbers are high compared to a SF bench. That's going to come back and bite his business.
They don't match many SF benches that haven't had their calibration altered. You could've proven that by joining the head flow test. You chose not to. It makes sense. It's also very clear why you bought an SF bench. A fair amount of work and financial investment for someone who's not worried...Chad Speier wrote:[NICE! Your the type guy that I've been talking about. Your the guy that is the problem with this industry.
Chad, you want to call me an idiot? Fine, I'll call you a liar.
I've answered your questions, even went out of my way to send you photos.
I question your integrity, your intelligence, and most of all exactly what you are doing here.
You call me a liar because I don't like what you posted. Actually, I already knew that. The fact your not concerned about it answers all my questions..
You say my numbers are high but yet they match more benches than not. You questions my morals and then have the balls to call me a liar. Well, that is pathetic.
Now that is clear, back to the discussion at hand!
definitely not meBrucepts wrote:
* We all know that that John Holms guy had a big penis, wait that guy was spelled Holmes wasn't it???
Dude, what the hell is your problem! You have something to say, spit it out. You have NO IDEA what your saying! However, it's typical and again your the problem with this industry.65mustang393 wrote:They don't match many SF benches that haven't had their calibration altered!Chad Speier wrote:[NICE! Your the type guy that I've been talking about. Your the guy that is the problem with this industry.
Chad, you want to call me an idiot? Fine, I'll call you a liar.
I've answered your questions, even went out of my way to send you photos.
I question your integrity, your intelligence, and most of all exactly what you are doing here.
You call me a liar because I don't like what you posted. Actually, I already knew that. The fact your not concerned about it answers all my questions..
You say my numbers are high but yet they match more benches than not. You questions my morals and then have the balls to call me a liar. Well, that is pathetic.
Now that is clear, back to the discussion at hand!
There it is. Thats how I know. Calcs out to the CSA with proper radius as measured.Chad Speier wrote:
You know that your pitot tube will tell you if your numbers are low or high... That is if it has been calibrated as well.