PTS Flowbench Forum

I got no money so no magazine articles for PTS

On another note please do not let this thread digress the way of other forum's threads . . . thanks (not directed at John*)


* We all know that that John Holms guy had a big penis, wait that guy was spelled Holmes wasn't it???

Gerald,

This discussion was moving in a positive light without any turd tossing not sure what value it brings, we all understand you are trying to defend your position on your current and prior purchases I personally appreciate the fact that you posted live numbers showing yet again another bench now with electronics just as bad as the rest.

Lets try to keep the discussion moving in an educational fashion as the rest of that BS adds no value.

Rick

Brucepts wrote:
I'm truly an orphan in the Flowbench community, don't think anyone likes me other than the forum members

I will explain why Bruce It is like one year a long time ago a friend of mine had bought a new Corvair Corsa 140 hp and we went to a Mustang Rally. He set fast time in it after they humored us and let him run it telling us "Don't expect much compared to these 'Stangs!" LMAO when they asked us to leave. You have showed up at a high dollar Corvette Rally in your Fiero and whizzed them all (the other flow bench people) and they don't like it. If you spend a lot of money on your Audi R8 and some DIY shows up in an old home built vehicle that cost a tenth the price and he beats you, then you have to justify your expenditure some way.

John

[

Chad, you want to call me an idiot? Fine, I'll call you a liar.

NICE! Your the type guy that I've been talking about. Your the guy that is the problem with this industry.

I've answered your questions, even went out of my way to send you photos.

I question your integrity, your intelligence, and most of all exactly what you are doing here.

You call me a liar because I don't like what you posted. Actually, I already knew that. The fact your not concerned about it answers all my questions..

You say my numbers are high but yet they match more benches than not. You questions my morals and then have the balls to call me a liar. Well, that is pathetic.

Now that is clear, back to the discussion at hand!

Chad's numbers are high compared to a SF bench. That's going to come back and bite his business.

65mustang393 wrote:Chad's numbers are high compared to a SF bench. That's going to come back and bite his business.

Just worry about yourself Gerald! And your WRONG.

Chad Speier wrote:[

Chad, you want to call me an idiot? Fine, I'll call you a liar.

NICE! Your the type guy that I've been talking about. Your the guy that is the problem with this industry.

I've answered your questions, even went out of my way to send you photos.

I question your integrity, your intelligence, and most of all exactly what you are doing here.

You call me a liar because I don't like what you posted. Actually, I already knew that. The fact your not concerned about it answers all my questions..

You say my numbers are high but yet they match more benches than not. You questions my morals and then have the balls to call me a liar. Well, that is pathetic.

Now that is clear, back to the discussion at hand!

They don't match many SF benches that haven't had their calibration altered. You could've proven that by joining the head flow test. You chose not to. It makes sense. It's also very clear why you bought an SF bench. A fair amount of work and financial investment for someone who's not worried...

Brucepts wrote:
* We all know that that John Holms guy had a big penis, wait that guy was spelled Holmes wasn't it???

definitely not me when I first got married my wife says "Who are you going to pleasure with that?" I told her "me!"

Yes let's try and keep this thread focused on the fact that a DIY item can be as good or better than a high dollar item. That is what keeps true hot rodding going. And it is always better with a little help from my friends.

John (Not the Wad) Holm

65mustang393 wrote:

Chad Speier wrote:[

Chad, you want to call me an idiot? Fine, I'll call you a liar.

NICE! Your the type guy that I've been talking about. Your the guy that is the problem with this industry.

I've answered your questions, even went out of my way to send you photos.

I question your integrity, your intelligence, and most of all exactly what you are doing here.

You call me a liar because I don't like what you posted. Actually, I already knew that. The fact your not concerned about it answers all my questions..

You say my numbers are high but yet they match more benches than not. You questions my morals and then have the balls to call me a liar. Well, that is pathetic.

Now that is clear, back to the discussion at hand!

They don't match many SF benches that haven't had their calibration altered!

Dude, what the hell is your problem! You have something to say, spit it out. You have NO IDEA what your saying! However, it's typical and again your the problem with this industry.

So I suggest you just stop posting because now all your doing is causing trouble.

See guys I come to a place that is for DIY guys and I find that fucking asshole I've been talking about that doesn't even have a DIY bench.

That flow around WAS a joke!

Chad Speier wrote:
You know that your pitot tube will tell you if your numbers are low or high... That is if it has been calibrated as well.

There it is. Thats how I know. Calcs out to the CSA with proper radius as measured.

I wonder.....was it a turkey sub or just a ham/salami/provolone?