olympiadis wrote:Took two heads to get tested.
Man tried to test head on SF600.
Bench got hot, he turned into an ass, took my money and told me to leave because he wasn't going to run the machine anymore.
Took heads to second shop with similar SF600. This one also got hot which stretched out my wait time to half a day, and the operator also got frustrated and just wanted to take my money and let me leave.
Going through 15 lift stations on two ports was more than it could handle and I consider that ridiculous, and hence
it is a very important factor to consider.
I'm not going to be doing porting, then only check at one lift and shut it down. That's dumb.
....
If those guys couldn't do 15 lift stations on two ports without their benches overheating, it sounds like they were giving you an excuse to NOT do your work. 15 point sweeps sound like 0.050" lift increments, and is probably why no one wants to do your work - 0.050" is a pain to do without electronics -, because basically, if a bench couldn't do that little work, what's the use of a bench. I personally wouldn't waste my time with 0.050" increments if I had to measure it manually, because it would reduce the amount of tests I could do in a day for no benefit.
I will give you an idea of time to do a typical 4 cyl twin cam 16v head manually
A 10 year old SF110 develpoment
http://www.flickr.com/photos/78870261@N08/9503740343/
60 hours development and porting, which included 57 inlet and 38 exh tests, and that didn't include the analysing time. You could imagine how much extra time it is to do 0.050", with so much more time to actually measure it and analyse it, and all it would do is add wasted resolution to trends that you can already see at 0.100"