I think you will find two "camps" on motor control . . . those that think they need it and those who know they do not. I personally have no clue if I need it or not
I've talked to various levels of flowbench users and find that most do not want it and want to know and see when the static pressure changes. The ones doing individual port development work do not need it (they want to see the static change when they are port probing) and the ones just measuring CFM for customer heads would like it to speed up production to increase profit margin.
Is it a possible future project? Yes, it could be we just have to find all the bits and pieces that make it possible as Tony suggested above. It's not a front burner project though I'll say that much as I feel the demand is quite low. I may be wrong in this assumption?
If we do develop something it will work with the existing base of PTS DM's already out in the field so nobody will need to send it back to the "factory" for any upgrades.
One problem I have in new product development is the initial cash outlay, I have kept the prices of all my products at a level the average person can afford so I do not have a large profit margin to dump into new product development. Probably a poor business model on my part but that's the way I'm running PTS.
Right now Rick is in a somewhat major upgrade to FlowSoft Basic and we want to get Larry back online with his excellent FlowSoft Excel product to compliment the existing PTS DM customer base.