by Jesse Lackman » Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:43 am
That pitot must be for velocity probing a port right?
The biggest problem is that you have to be a contortionist to bolt up the 4" flange under the test fixture feed box.
Hopefully I can make up some work and headache in the tuning and calibration phase. I saw on speedtalk where you said to study and understand how manometers work, I see all this complicated stuff on orifice plate CDs etc, well I don't know if I want to overload my poor brain with that stuff so I'm simply blowing it all off with the FP-1 and a pitot. Orifices are for round robins. :laugh:
Even Einstein didn't know his own phone number, he said why clutter up your brain with something you can look up in a book.
The pitots are done except for the impact and static holes, now it is deciding the hole size and on which duct traversing gobbledy-gook to use, "Centroids of Equal Areas" or "Log-Tchebycheff"
I think the pitots might be better with the signal tubing sticking out both ends that way one could tee both ends to the FP-1 ports. That might offer a better signal than coming off of only one end of the pressure signal tubes.
BTW I'm getting a quote on custom tube in a 4:1 ellipse .875 x .218. If it is reasonable I might by some.
Jesse Lackman