by Tony » Thu Apr 06, 2006 9:52 pm
Just some further comment on the construction of these two commercial blower rotors.
Blower number #1 was originally rated at 300 CFM and 17 inches flow standard. It had a direct coupled 1Hp motor, which turned the rotor at 2850 Rpm (50Hz power here).
Inlet eye size 3.5 inches, discharge from the snail volute 2.75 inches. Rotor diameter 18 inches, consisting of two flat steel sheets spaced half an inch apart at the outer periphery, and slightly more widely spaced near the centre. Short straight blades only three inches long hold the two flat drive discs apart.
The way the rotor is constructed, the flat disks have short narrow radial slots punched in them, and the punched vanes have tabs which project through these narrow slots. The tabs are bent flat and either welded (or brazed ?) to the two flat steel discs.
I modified this blower by replacing the direct drive motor with pulley drive which had a speed step up ratio of 2:1. I then used a 10 Hp 2850 Rpm three phase motor and a variable speed drive to run the rotor up to 5,700 Rpm.
Flow almost doubled to around 550 CFM. Pressure went up four times to 65 inches, and drive horsepower increased eight times to approximately 8 Hp. This blower is currently what I am running in my bench.
I have recently purchased blower number #2. This one already has pulley drive, and the original standard ratings are 450 CFM at 19 inches pressure. The pulley ratio is (4.25/3.75) 1.13 speed step up. The 3Hp (oversized) motor runs at 2850 Rpm, and the blower rotor at around 3230 Rpm.
The rotor is very similar to the first one in all respects, but the construction is different. The vanes again are straight radial, but are simple flat metal strips folded into a Z shape. These are spot welded to the inside of the rear disk. The front disk is then just placed on top, and pop riveted in position.
Higher rated airflow seems to come more from the generous internal flow paths than the actual rotor dimensions. The inlet eye is four inches, and the discharge is three and a half inches.
I plan to not use pulley drive on this second effort, but directly couple a 15 Hp motor rated at 2850 Rpm. I then plan to run this motor up to double it's rated speed by running my variable frequency drive up to 100 Hz. That will get rid of the pulleys and make it a far more compact assembly. I have not purchased the 15 Hp flange mount motor yet, but have sourced one for $200 from a machinery yard and will, probably Monday.
With a bit of luck this second blower should give me perhaps 800 CFM at 60 inches, with some very nice pressure/flow characteristics. If the rotor does explode, I can make a stronger one fairly easily using thicker gauge metal and better construction.
The outer volute on the first blower is two cast iron halves. The volute on the second blower is pressed mild steel sheet, again, two halves bolted together.
Also known as the infamous "Warpspeed" on some other Forums.